Info

Friday, December 31, 2010

Sweets: A Request


FRIDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2010


Sweets: A Request

Barbara has gotten somewhat somnolent again and even fell asleep during her physical therapy session this afternoon. The therapist suggested that too much sweet food may be making her sleepy. Indeed, most visitors have been bringing her very rich deserts and I am at a loss to keep her from eating a lot of that stuff. Yesterday, she O.D.'d on sweets so this may be part of the problem. While I am very grateful for the kind thoughts behind those gifts, I hope that the temptation to bringing very rich foods to Barbara could be resisted. She does indeed enjoy those things but, for the reason mentioned and other obvious ones, please consider this request. 

It is natural to inquire what the connection between sweets and the somnolence may be. In my profession we make up stories to go with what seems to be happening before our eyes and so, knowing that I know nothing of this business, I offer a rationalization anyway. 

In my reading about tumors I have learned that they need glucose to grow and those rich foods may supply glucose to Barbara's tumor in abundance. If the tumor swells, it will press on the surrounding blood vessels and so cut off the blood supply to (at least parts of) her brain. 

This may not be sound medical theory but, taken with the advice of the physical therapist, it points to a suggestion that I hope that we may be guided by. 

Happy new year to all,
ed

Sweets: A Request

Barbara has gotten somewhat somnolent again and even fell asleep during her physical therapy session this afternoon. The therapist suggested that too much sweet food may be making her sleepy. Indeed, most visitors have been bringing her very rich deserts and I am at a loss to keep her from eating a lot of that stuff. Yesterday, she O.D.'d on sweets so this may be part of the problem. While I am very grateful for the kind thoughts behind those gifts, I hope that the temptation to bringing very rich foods to Barbara could be resisted. She does indeed enjoy those things but, for the reason mentioned and other obvious ones, please consider this request.

It is natural to inquire what the connection between sweets and the somnolence may be. In my profession we make up stories to go with what seems to be happening before our eyes and so, knowing that I know nothing of this business, I offer a rationalization anyway.

In my reading about tumors I have learned that they need glucose to grow and those rich foods may supply glucose to Barbara's tumor in abundance. If the tumor swells, it will press on the surrounding blood vessels and so cut off the blood supply to (at least parts of) her brain.

This may not be sound medical theory but, taken with the advice of the physical therapist, it points to a suggestion that I hope that we may be guided by.

Happy new year to all,
ed

Monday, December 27, 2010

Joan's conversation with Barbara

My conversation with B. was very exciting. Her voice seemed almost normal, and we talked about the art exhibits I saw in London, the Turner Prize and compared the Nat. Gallery in London to the Prado. Ed says it is really a matter of whether she is up or down, but it's nice to hear that others have also had encouraging conversations.

Joan Pearlman

Monday, December 20, 2010

At the oncologist's

Today is December 14, our day for another visit to Dr. Omuro. The appointment was for 9:00 a.m., which automatically carried the instruction to come twenty minutes early. In this instance, there was no reason to be early since it was not a visit that Dr. O. seemed to take very seriously. December 14 was also the day for the patients on the fifth floor of 607 Hudson Street to be moved to the new building at 214 Houston Street. So we were lucky to be out of the way for that activity (which in fact went well).

I got to Hudson St. at 5:45 or so and found that Barbara was awake and had been dressed, except for her shoes, by Shelly the night caregiver. Mimi had dropped off a couple of croissants and four mandarins (or tangerines as they were called in the Bronx back when) on the previous evening. So we had a light breakfast and settled back to await departure in the car I had ordered for 7:45. Hyacinth, the day care person arrived somewhat after seven at around the same time as the institutional breakfast and insisted on feeding this to Barbara. I was not in favor of all that eating but H. has been getting more and more obdurate and pressed on with the cream of wheat and omelet. I suspect that many people in her profession are in the habit of helping moribund patients and are not able to adapt to caring for thinking entities.

Steve C. then came over to help and went downstairs to wait for the hired car. Annie, a leader of the caregiving consortium came in to direct just as Steve came back to report that the car had arrived. There were too many cooks brewing but we finally got Barbara downstairs in her wheel chair and into the car. Getting the wheel chair into the trunk was a bit harder than getting Barbara into the car because of the additional contribution of the driver. The weather was not helpful with the temperature in the twenties (F) but we got to 53rd St. in good time and settled into the sumptuous waiting room to await the call. (Fruit juices, coffee, tea and chocolate were the available beverages and the snacks were graham crackers and pretzels.) I was disappointed to find that Barbara was not wearing the corduroy jacket we had had in mind for this outing but such things were to be expected with everyone pulling in a different direction.

At last we were greeted by the pleasant receptionist whom we had seen previously. After we had inquired politely how she had done in the NY marathon, she led us into an examination room to await examination. But before the fateful meeting there came the obligatory brief interrogation by the highly competent onco-nurse. Finally, Dr. Omuro himself joined us.

Perfunctory greetings having been exchanged, I reported that Barbara in the past few days has been sorely burdened by fatigue and has slept through visits by various friends. Nevertheless, she had carried on some pleasant conversations that Judy V. found enjoyable and that Diana C. called amazing. Dr. O. was not impressed and preferred to test Barbara's conversational skills with some straightforward questions such "What is this?" or "Who is that?" Barbara's response to these was to smile and shake her head. This gave Dr. O. a bad impression of her cognition. He also felt that her walking ability had not improved much since our last visit.

These perceptions gave him a dim view of our prospects, which he revealed to me when we had repaired to a nearby small office to confer. I can only imagine what Barbara thought our leaving the room meant. And she would have been right. The doctor told me that if Barbara stayed where she is, she probably cannot have further treatment since the rehab center would be financially responsible for this and it is expensive. Since she is an inpatient, they would not be allowed to let me pay for the treatment and perhaps they would not want to in any case. (On our return to the rehab center, I asked Michael, the social worker about this, and he said that he would inquire with the financial department. I have had no word as yet.) Likewise, were she in hospice care, further treatment would be precluded as well. It appears that only if she were at home would she be eligible for treatment. And doctor O. felt that it would be dangerous for her to be at home in her condition. I don't know if I agree with his assessment but, in any case, I would like to get a better staff of caregivers in place before taking Barbara home with them. The lack of any medical personnel is something I worry about.

The possible treatments Dr. O. discussed with me were Avastin or a combination of Avastin and TMZ. These are discussed separately in the in the earlier bulletins and are also described in Wikipedia and some Google sources. But the doctor did point out the possible adverse side effects of Avastin (such as kidney problems) especially for people in Barbara's age group.

He left me impression that he was meeting us only because he had been pressed to so. He was apparently aware of my inquiries with Dr. Posner (reported in earlier bulletins) and was offering me all possible options except that of an understanding inquiry into Barbara's condition.

In the evening with Barbara ensconced in her new bed, I was drawn out, against my better judgement on all this within hearing of a deeply sleeping Barbara. Does she take such things in subconsciously? At any rate, as we were getting her into bed for the night somewhat later, she looked for her coat and spoke of the 'hood.' I finally realized that she meant 'hood' -home, in effect- not the hood on her coat. She wanted to go home, whereas two days ago she had replied ambivalently to a question about whether she wanted this. I must reconsider the options. The new building has lived up to my expectations of a clean well-lit place that should provide a morale raising milieu. But it is not a home even with me present during almost all of Barbara's waking hours?

The truth is that I still would like to get some treatment for Barbara. It may be a selfish wish but I think it only natural. Yet for every piece of advice encouraging this wish, I have received an equally reasonable discouraging one. On the other hand, I am not happy with Dr. O.'s assessments. On Thursday, two days after most of this bulletin was written, Sharon, the physical therapist, took Barbara walking. She was able to trudge along unsupported for a good distance (100 ft. or more), though she was carefully watched. Not only was her walking much better than Dr. O. could get her to perform, but her speech has been impressive. Tracy, the speech therapist managed to fit in a brief session on the afternoon of moving day (Tuesday) and reported that Barbara was speaking well. Then two days after our meeting with Dr. O., we saw Dr. David at the Rusk Rehabilitation Center for a standard follow up to our stay there about a month ago. Dr. David also asked Barbara direct questions, including some of the ones that Dr. O. asked and Barbara answered them easily. Yet, Dr. O. does get her to clam up when asking the same sorts of questions.

My problem is not with with the procedures per se. It is that I do not is how much the (to me) unsympathetic examination procedures Barbara submits to at MSKCC influence the treatments (or lack of them) that are on offer. After all, some members of the tumor team have not seen Barbara at all and their opinions are formed on the basis of second hand information based on this kind of examination.

[ Here is a letter from Karl Lauby, Vice President for Communications, The New York Botanical Garden, a fellow chorister of Barbara's and a loyal friend, to a friend of his after he lost his wife to ovarian cancer. Karl has kindly allowed me to include this excerpt from his letter though we both understand that anecdotes about ovarian cancer may not bear directly on what happens with brain tumors. ]

From: "Lauby, Karl" December 15, 2010
Subject: Lila and Avastin with Cytoxan
Ed, Here is Lila's Avastin Cytoxan experience as indicated by the numbers below. Different cancer, different person, all different. In any case, this was one patients experience.

I guess all the fuss in the popular press about Avastin and some chemo combination, (a cocktail, right?) is about the variation that Lila received that led to this dramatic drop in her CA 125 I recorded in June 2008. According to my notes, that went on six months to January 2009. Then we tried weekly taxal. Then we tried the trial at MSKCC which did not work and things went downhill. So it appears to me Lila got a little more than the reported average of four months from this Avastin combination. (I assume cytoxan is form of close to standard chemo theapy.) I just wish we had not started to slide in the summer of 2009. I guess the nature of Stage IV ovarian is that the slide starts sometime. Just wish we could have kept on the level longer.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Persevering



We returned from MSKCC to our subacute rehab center on Hudson St. on Dec. 2. (I am getting shaky on dates and other such details, but I have the time intervals more or less straight). For various reasons, some of which you may have read already in earlier bulletins, we decided to try getting our caregivers from an agency. We consulted two people familiar with such things and they suggested the same agency --- Partners in Care. So we called them and they provided round the clock coverage.

The rule in these situations is that a caregiver does not leave the patient until a replacement arrives. In the first three days of our use of the agency, their caregivers were quite late, one by five hours. This left the one that was waiting in a terrible state. I was none too calm about it either. Then, on Thursday, Dec. 9, I got a phone call at 6:15am from the rehab center. The caller hemmed and hawed for a while, worrying me no end, till he finally confessed that Barbara had gotten out of bed and fallen at 2:15am. It was not clear why he waited so long to notify me but this was not the moment to discuss such issues. I got myself to Hudson St. and found Barbara asleep and seemingly OK except for some bruises on her arms.

This was quite painful especially as the chief reason for engaging the agency was to prevent just such incidents. According to some of the nurses' aides, the watcher of that evening was observed napping behind a curtain. This called for some action and I spoke to various people including the workers in the rehab center. We got some names and Mimi tried to put together a cohort of watchers but it proved impossible to mesh their schedules to achieve full time coverage, especially given the need to hurry. We did finally manage to hire a consortium of caregivers that seems more reliable than some of the agency people. None of these arrangements is perfect but it seems as if the present situation is workable, in large part because of Barbara's bravery and cooperative spirit. She has been amazing throughout this whole ordeal which has now gone on for over seven months.

In the past few days, from about the 9th of December, Barbara has been conversing with visitors, carrying on with her therapies (physical and speech) and gamely battling the intense fatigue caused by her illness and (I gather) her medication. It grieves me greatly to leave her side at night but I feel that the present arrangement is still safer for her than living at home in her present impulsive mode. And she has medical care at all times here at the rehab center.

There were also a few small disappointments in the past week besides the fall, which upset me far more than it upset Barbara. Ulla was going to come down from Cambridge to New Haven on Wednesday Dec. 9 and join up there with Kim. They were planning to come into town together for lunch with Barbara and Mimi. But Willem fell quite ill and so that meeting has been postponed until Willem is in better shape.

Then, on the evening of Dec. 10, Mimi called to report that Barbara's coat was missing. This was just the right coat for the current weather and I was planning on using it for our trip uptown on Tuesday when we are to see Dr. Omuro. I will skip the details of that detective story but report only that the coat was returned to the room on the next day, Saturday. This allowed me to take Barbara out for a wheel chair ride. We bought a berry scone in a nearby famers' market and ate it in the sunshine in Abingdon Square, a pleasant mini-park. When I then asked Barbara if she wanted a cappuccino, she said yes and off we went to the Minerva coffee shop on 4th St. I made a bad choice there because there was no wheel chair access. But after all this time in these circumstances, I know my wheel chairs and got the thing up the (approximately) five inch high step. Imagine my disappointment when Barbara did not like the cappuccino at all. (She has not had real coffee for several months and may have lost the taste for it.) Still, it was a very enjoyable outing.

The next day, Sunday, Judy and Mimi were to take Barbara to a bistro for lunch but they were rained out. So they settled for nice visits separately in Barbara's room. Mimi brought lox and bagels but Barbara preferred the Sunday turkey dinner provided by the Center. Her taste buds are completely other than of old owing to various factors. But Mimi and I enjoyed the brunch Mimi had provided. (Yes, I showed up in time for that.)

Now it is Monday evening (Dec. 13). Barbara has had one of her sleepier days and she has slept through visits of Steve C. (who brought me a sushi lunch) and Peter K. who told me how to prepare a reed for use with an oboe. Tomorrow morning we'll set off at 7:45 to go see Oncologist Omuro and then return to the new quarters at 214 Houston St. --- assuming that the move will have been completed on schedule. I believe that our new room number will be 218 but there is no telling for sure till we are installed.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Moving to Houston St.. on Tuesday

Talked to Ed. Barbara has been doing better this week - he has taken her out on a wheelchair, had scones while sitting in the sun, then went to have espresso, but she did not like the taste of it. She has been talking to her friends.

Lots of friends are stopping by, and that is very nice. Would be more rational of one can schedule them a bit, so just one friend is reliably by her side at any given time, but Ed thinks that is impossible. I could try to set up a web-accessible calendar (in principle it already exists) but I am not too hopeful either (if my graduate students are any indicator of what is within realm of possible). Correct me if I am wrong.

They are going to see Dr. Omuro on Tuesday December 14 at 8:45AM. It is going to be a busy day, as on Tuesday Barbara is also being moved from the 607 Hudson St. to the new
VillageCare Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
214 W. Houston St.
Barbara's sister Mimi has seen it and says it is very nice - it is also only 6 blocks away from their apartment.

Will try to keep you posted - Predrag

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Back Downtown

The last report was from MSKCC (also S-K in some of these notes) where Barbara was recovering from her inability to walk and from a more intense fatigue than ever. When we were in the rehab center on Hudson Street, they had tapered her steroid (decadron --- Dexamethasone) down to 8 mg/day and then stopped it entirely. They did not tell me this and only when I was perturbed by her increased lethargy and loss of bien etre did I inquire and learn this. According to information gleaned from Google,
Stopping the drug abruptly can cause loss of appetite, upset stomach, vomiting, drowsiness, confusion, headache, fever, joint and muscle pain, peeling skin, and weight loss.
So it is perhaps not unexpected that the drop from 8 to 0 had some adverse effect. At her physical therapy session on November 23 she was overcome by fatigue and unable to stand. She was put into bed and I could not rouse her for three hours, as reported in an earlier bulletin. Dr. Delosso ordered her an ambulance that delivered us back to MSKCC and to their Urgent Care unit. There, the decadron dose was augmented to 18 mg/day and Barbara's condition slowly improved. But not before she had been seen by doctors on rounds who found her speech problems difficult and her gait poor. These evaluations have an influence on the treatments that the doctors are willing to recommend. The opinions of the doctors were aired at their brain tumor conference on November 29 in the presence of the attending physicians of the department of neurosurgery, radiation oncology, neuro-oncology and neuroradiology. I hope it is not inappropriate to summarize their conclusions here (from a report by Dr. Delios):
Barbara Spiegel is a 72 year old woman diagnosed in May of 2010 with a left frontal astrocytoma , which was low grade on biopsy but behaved as high grade radiographically. She was treated with RT and Temodar that was completed on October 5th 2010 during an inpatient stay because of poor mobility. She did not have gross resection because of the tumor location. She now has global aphasia and poor gait despite VP shunt placement in September 2010. She was readmitted to the hospital from the nursing home because of lethargy that has improved after increase in steroids. Spine MRI shows a plaque of enhancement in the cervical spine. The Tumor Board recommendation was palliative care since the patient's overall condition and neurological debilitation precludes her from returning to live at home.
[ I will not inflict my layman's opinions on you here. Yet I would like to report that when I asked how the the tumor had gone from low grade to hight grade in the six weeks (or so) between the two assessments, I was told that the tumor is heterogeneous. That I can believe. But what I don't understand is why the high grade part was not noticed on the extensive radiographic evidence available at the time of the biopsy. I think it more likely that the difference between the two evaluations was a result of a strong temporal variation. This suggests to me that prompter action would have led to an improved situation. After all, in early May, when Dr. Gutin saw the first MRI, he said, already back then that it looked like there was a glioma. ]

But now we are talking about early December. On the 2nd she could walk a bit and her efforts at speaking had increased noticeably. So we headed back to the rehab center on Hudson St. The trip from 67th St. to Hudson and 12th took 1 hr 40 min., which is a bit long by any standards. One reason was that the ambulance driver refused to listen to my suggestions about the route and preferred the instructions of the GPS whose route from the east side to the west of Manhattan by way of the Brooklyn Bridge. (Later investigation revealed that there is a Hudson Ave.) After the driver allowed me to get him back to Manhattan, he turned things over to the GPS again and we wandered around for quite a while. The other reason was that a wrong address had been entered into the GPS. But we finally got to 607 Hudson St.

On the evening of December 2, I realized that Barbara had not received any medications so inquired about this. The drugs had not been ordered on time and the pharmacy was closed. Not all of the prescribed medications were available at the nurses' station. I was very worried lest Barbara should miss her nightly decadron dose and her anti-seizure pills. So I went home to where I had some drugs left from the days when were staying there and managed to get back to Hudson St.by 8:00 p.m. (pill time in the center). One might think of complaining about all this if an exactly parallel event had not occurred at MSKCC as readers of the previous blurbs may recall.

The next day, Dec. 4, when turned to throw something into the waste paper basket, Barbara got up out of a wheel chair and walked toward me. Of course, she was not supposed to do that but it was good to see that she could. Still, this impetuosity shows that she is a danger to herself and has to be watched all the time. She has no hesitation in trying to climb out of bed whenever the urge strikes her. So we have had to hire companions who call for help as needed. We had such help on our previous stay here but, for various reasons, have used an agency to provide the companions this time.

Two days passed with Barbara in a good mood. She walked over one hundred feet using a walker and her speaking improved. Unfortunately, she speaks a bit too quietly for my poor hearing. Still, she chatted amiably with visitors on the weekend of Dec. 3 and things took on a rosy look. But on the following Monday she had grown morose and was hardly talking. She even admitted to being in a bad mood, something she never has done before in our fifty years together. On Tuesday, the 7th, she was in a slightly better mood but the fatigue was on her and even overcame her as she chatted with a visitor.

The fluctuations from day to day are not easy to understand and it may be that hospital life is just too depressing. The possibility of moving Barbara home has been gone over with various friends. The rehab center is moving to a new building on December 14th (we hear). I feel that we should wait and see what the new center is like before we make that difficult decision. Also the issue of whom to hire as caregivers is under discussion. There are rational arguments about that as well and I'll mention some aspects in the next report. But it is the irrational that weighs most with me since I seem to be able to make rational arguments for any of the points of view.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Sunday, December 5, 2010

To Barbara's New York friends: moved to #528 (a different room)

Barbara has moved to room 528 in 607 Hudson St.
(Sorry for the spam.)

Ed

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Back to rehab, 607 Hudson St - changed room

We have moved from MSKCC to return to the rehab place, room 328, 607 Hudson St. at the corner of 12th St. The entrance is on 12th. Look for the green canopy.

Ed

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Libby's letter to Barbara

Dear Barbara,

Jean-Pierre told me yesterday that you have been very ill, and I have been thinking of you and holding you in my heart ever since. I hope this note finds you feeling better.

I have been thinking back to the wonderful times we had together in New York in the late 70s. I had just met my future husband at the opera. Soon he introduced me to his brilliant professor and his elegant wife. You have the gift of being sincerely interested in the people around you and soon I was lavished with the special Barbara brand of attention, which included sumptuous dinners in your home, where you showed me before I had even been to France what sophistication and good food was all about. [You are such a practical person, too, though. Just last week my daughter Sarah, said, “Mom! You can’t put wooden spoons in the dishwasher!” and I replied, “Barbara told me in 1980 that she puts everything in the dishwasher, and if Barbara does it, then I can too!”]

One time J-P and I tried to show you that we could cook gourmet meals too. J-P had shopped for ingredients at the crack of dawn and spent the entire day cooking. The four of us had a memorable meal together and when you left at 2:00 a.m., an exhausted but happy J-P shut the door, lay down on the floor, and fell asleep in the hall! That only happens with very best friends.

Do you remember the time the four of us took the Freddie Laker flight to London? They didn’t serve food, so you supplied the most extravagant picnic I have ever had in my life, from foie gras to tarte au citron. The people in the nearby rows hated us!

Back in New York, I remember the two of us—you and me—struggling through the joys and pitfalls of the publishing business. We were both wondering what our niche could be, and I remember your simple insight: “Writers write.” This was tremendously helpful to me in my decision to make my career instead on the editorial side. I have thought of these words many times since.

It was a tremendous gift for me in those days to have such an instant connection with you, Barbara. You were married and established in your lifestyle, and I was so grateful that you took us into your lives. It was simply astonishing that, because of your open and deeply caring manner, we could and did talk about absolutely everything. Your great knowledge of people is happily paired with a seemingly infinite concern for their well-being, and for that we love you very much.

With a warm, warm hug for all you have given to me over the years,

Libby

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

November 23: Bad to Worse

[When you last heard from me, the issue of what to do next was opened and it is still unresolved. But that has been shelved because of recent developments that I describe here.]

Barbara has been growing increasingly lethargic in the past few weeks and having more difficulties with her speaking. There seemed to be a transition for the worse on November 10. I managed to find out that her daily dose of steroids had been discontinued on that day and was able get it reinstated because (I suspect) that Dr. Delosso was humoring me. (He seemed to base his reaction on the behavior of his mother when his father had also had an aggressive astrocytoma.)

Since the onset of Barbara's increased weakness and fatigue there were many ups and downs, yet Barbara carried on with her usual bravery, cheering people up with warm smiles of recognition as they came by. But, by the weekend of November 21, she had become ever more somnolent and was unable to interact with her visitors over that weekend. By Tuesday morning (23rd), she was unable even to stand up for her physical therapy and was put into bed shortly before 10:00am. I was unable to wake her in the next two and a half hours and sought medical advice. No one was available at Dr. Omuro's number and the local medical staff on Hudson St. was in conference, but I finally reached Dr. David at the Rusk Institute on 17th St. Dr. David suggested that it was an emergency and that she ought to be taken to a hospital.

When Dr. Delosso in the rehab center finally emerged from the meeting, he agreed that the situation was serious and arranged to have Barbara taken to MSKCC. Once there, we went straight to the Urgent Care Unit where we spent some time having a chest X-ray, a CT scan and a catheter inserted to measure the urine production. We were then moved up to our old haunt, the neurology ward. There the neurologist on the night shift, Dr. Saad, came to tell me that he suspected meningitis. I googled meningitis and I did not find the diagnosis convincing. Dr. S. wanted to do a spinal tap (a.k.a. lumbar puncture). I asked why he did not get the fluid from the shunt and he said that only a neurosurgeon can do this and there is none on duty in the evening.

Since Barbara's symptoms were not a good match for the list I had found on Google so I didn't know whether to let them do the puncture. However, Dr. S. considered it urgent to start the treatment at once if Barbara had meningitis. So I finally agreed, after consultation with Mimi and Engelbert, though I still had misgivings. Barbara did not enjoy the proceedings and, as I learned early the next morning, she did not have meningitis. Medical opinions that I received the next day confirmed my suspicions that the lumbar puncture was ill-advised.

[ An Aside.
When you get off the elevator on our floor of MSKCC, you are greeted by a poster warning people not to visit if they have cold symptoms --- fever, sneezing, sniffles, cough. But when the Dr. S. was getting ready for the spinal tap (on our floor), he put on a mask, behind which he was coughing. I asked if he had a cold. He said that he did not, it was only a sore throat.]


Before Barbara's lumbar was punctured, we had to wait till after the MRI was made. As it turned out, a competent examination of that would have suggested that the tap was unnecessary. And so Barbara suffered for my uncertainty.

But that MRI brought even worse news: the tumor has grown. I learned this first from a Dr. Chan who was doing rounds together with the usual crowd of acolytes. Dr. Chan, who was on his last day in MKSCC, said that the latest MRI had indicated growth of the tumor and thought that some portion of the tumor might be surgically removable. However, Dr. Gutin came by later in the day and expressed doubts about this suggestion. He will talk to Omuro about this. In the meantime, Barbara's dosages of steroid and anti-seizure medication have been increased. If she can get stronger she may be eligible for trials of some kind. Otherwise, some sort of hospice care is the forlorn option.

For now, we are still in MSKCC and are likely to be here till the November 29th, at any rate.

Ed

Monday, November 15, 2010

Communicating With People Who Have Aphasia

[If you should be planning to visit Barbara, please have a look at these guidelines. Best wishes, to all. Ed]

Some "Do's & Donts":

Aphasia is a communication impairment usually acquired as a result of a stroke or other brain injury. It affects both the ability to express oneself through speech, gesture, and writing, and to understand the speech, gesture, and writing of others. Aphasia thus changes the way in which we communicate with those people most important to us: family, friends, and co-workers.

The impact of aphasia on relationships may be profound, or only slight. No two people with aphasia are alike with respect to severity, former speech and language skills, or personality. But in all cases it is essential for the person to communicate as successfully as possible from the very beginning of the recovery process. Here are some suggestions to help communicate with a person with aphasia:

Make sure you have the person's attention before communicating. During conversation, minimize or eliminate background noise (such as television, radio, other people) as much as possible.

Keep communication simple but adult. Simplify your own sentence structure and reduce your own rate of speech. You don't need to speak louder than normal but do emphasize key words. Don't talk down to the person with aphasia.

Encourage and use other modes of communication (writing, drawing, yes/no responses, choices, gestures, eye contact, facial expressions) in addition to speech.

Give them time to talk and let them have a reasonable amount of time to respond. Avoid speaking for the person with aphasia except when necessary and ask permission before doing so.

Praise all attempts to speak; make speaking a pleasant experience and provide stimulating conversation. Downplay errors and avoid frequent criticisms/corrections. Avoid insisting that each word be produced perfectly.

Augment speech with gesture and visual aids whenever possible. Repeat a statement when necessary.

Encourage them to be as independent as possible. Avoid being overprotective.

Whenever possible continue normal activities (such as dinner with family, company, going out).

Do not shield people with aphasia from family or friends or ignore them in a group conversation. Rather, try to involve them in family decision-making as much as possible. Keep them informed of events but avoid burdening them with day to day details.

These guidelines are intended to enhance communication with persons who have aphasia. However, they cannot guarantee that communication will be immediate or on a par with former skills.

Aphasia

This link from Ed on aphasia: www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/voice/aphasia.html is interesting; Barbara's tumor is in Broca and motor cortex area, her aphasia matches what is here described as "Broca’s aphasia," and suggestions for family involvement seem very helpful.
Predrag

Thursday, November 11, 2010

A biography of cancer

For a big perspective, The Emperor of All Maladies might be a book worth reading.

Predrag

Jack Whitehead - Barbara visit

I was able to visit Barbara and Ed on Thursday, November 11 while I was visiting Courant/NYU. After a noontime seminar followed by lunch at Courant, Steve Childress, who earlier had offered to accompany be for a visit, took me the few blocks to her room in the care center. She was with someone at the moment, so we went next door to join Ed, who was sitting with laptop in hand. He was very glad to see us both. After a few minutes of nice chat, we were allowed into Barbara's room where she clearly registered delight to see us both. Naturally, she didn't expect to see me but registered surprise and happiness clearly. In fact, she repeated "came all this way" two or three times after which it was clear that additional words came slowly to her. Soon, Joe Keller, who is staying in the city for a few months, joined us. Barbara slowly dropped to sleep in spite of the brilliance of the conversation and the wit of the jokes. We guys enjoyed a wonderful visit for a hour or so. She woke up alert and rested and after a few more words, we gave our fondest goodbyes. Barbara clearly looked very well even though she obviously has spent a lot of time in bed. Ed is a loving and attentive mate, and I can understand why he wants to stay with her as much as possible. I think short visits in the afternoon are greatly appreciated. Thank you Steve for helping me with this visit.

Jack Whitehead

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

The drug Avastin

A Direct Hit of Drugs to Treat Brain Cancer
NYTimes Science section, November 09, 2010

The brain surgeon to call is John Boockvar, phone 212-746-6042 e-mail jab2029@med.cornell.edu

posted by Joe Pedlosky

Saturday, November 6, 2010

A few pictures

A few nice pictures of Barbara and Ed by Jean-Paul Zahn.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Another MRI

On the afternoon of Nov. 2 after my meeting with the staff on Hudson St. [see previous bulletin], we got organized to go uptown for an MRI at 66th St. followed by an interview with Dr. Omuro. We got Barbara into warm clothes (it was a nippy day) and were just about to leave for uptown at 1:15 when a visitor appeared. She said that she was from the Rusk Rehab Center on 34th St. and that she was there to follow up on Barbara's condition. She is supposed to see Barbara every week, though this was news to us and was typical of the surprises we have had over the duration of B's illness. (Last week, her son was sick so she had not turned up.) The timing was wrong as we had to leave and not much information was exchanged. So off we went with Barbara in a wheel chair and Carla (one of the daughters mentioned in the last bulletin) to catch a cab on the street to the newest MSKCC campus on 66th St. and 2nd Ave. After a bit of fi ddling to get the wheel chair into the trunk of the cab, we were on our way.

Though we were quite early for our appointment, the MRI was not done on schedule and so we were late for our appointment with Dr. Omuro on 53rd St. We needed a cab to get from 66th St. and 2nd Ave to 53rd St. and 3rd Ave., which was not easy to fi nd around there at 5:15. But we wheeled a few blocks and got one. (We had phoned ahead to report that we would be late.) The nice assistant (receptionist?) remembered Barbara, greeted her warmly, and spoke of her plans to run in the NY marathon. Then a high level nurse asked us for details about Barbara's condition. And we were left alone for a while to await the appearance of Dr. O.

When Dr. O. came in, he did his best to display some humanity as he asked the usual questions. He got Barbara to stand and to walk a few steps and announced that she was walking better than when he had last seen her about a month previously, at the conclusion of her treatment. He seemed surprised about this, it occurred to me. Perhaps he was relying too much on the MRI, which he must have seen already. Then he tried her on speech. He asked what the date was and she smiled and said she did not know. I know lots of people walking around at large who would not know either. But, after a few such questions, whose answers she did not know, he pronounced her speech proficiency unimproved. He made no allowance for the facts that she had had two harrowing taxi rides, a lengthy stretch in radiology and that his manner was not soothing (to either of us). He felt that her speech problem would not improve and that this was a bad symptom. (For more on this issue please look at www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/voice/aphasia.html) He then called me into another room and said that the MRI showed no improvement in the tumor and that he felt that the treatment had not helped. He therefore suggested not giving more treatment and that we should consider hospice care. He had clearly looked at the MRI before seeing us and, I surmised, had made up his mind about the prognosis already. He did not off er to show me the latest MRI and I was too numb with grief to ask.

[ Intermezzo: On hearing my report of Tuesday's happenings, Doris Baker kindly o ffered to ask a doctor she knows at MSKCC to look into the matter and report his conclusions to me. I received a gracious letter from his assistant and a note from him summarizing his confi rmation of the report by Dr. O. concerning Barbara's diff use astrocytoma. (It became `dif use' during the two months it took to diagnose a tumor at NYU and MSKCC.) He also mentioned that she had been called completely aphasic.

I answered, somewhat intemperately, as follows:
My thanks to Dr. Posner for his trouble.
While I do not dispute the diagnosis stated I would like to point out that the conclusion that the patient is aphasic was made on the basis a couple of prefunctorily off ered questions to which the reply given was "I don't know." But the examination was conducted after the patient had been through a longish taxi ride through traffi c, a long session in a waiting room followed by an MRI scan lasting nearly an hour, a struggle for a taxi at 5:15 on 3rd Avenue and another passage in a waiting room. I know people who might have failed such a test who are distinguished members of learned professions.
On the next day, staff members in the rehab center were commenting on a witty remark the patient had made.
Moreover, I was not off ered a look at the scan but I imagine that it had something to do with the conclusion that must have been reached before the examination since it made no appearance during our presence.
I hope that not all your diagnoses are reached in such a cavalier manner.
Sincerely,
Then, under orders from Predrag and others, I added this foolishness:
Edward A. Spiegel Lewis Morris Rutherfurd Professor of Astronomy, Emeritus, Columbia University
Ever gracious, the good doctor responded that, having not seen the patient, he could not comment on the degree of aphasia but that symptoms of of tumors are intermittent (not his word). But, he added, there is extensive tumor shown in the MRI. ]


At that point in the examination, I turned to the question of trying cannabinoids which are considered palliative and which some investigators suspect may cause tumors to shrink. He brushed the whole subject aside saying, in eff ect, that at MSKCC everything is known and that there is nothing to this notion of the good eff ects of cannabinoids. I had with me a copy of a short one-paragraph letter from Alice W. that reported that her doctor had said that tetrohydrocannabinol (a.k.a. Malinol) is apparently harmless and might be beneffi cial in such cases. He refused to read that short paragraph, which came from the Stanford Medical School. So back downtown we went, tired but unhappy.

On the next day, I spoke to the nurse practitioner at the rehab center who had been on top of the situation from our arrival at VillageCare Rehab Center. I asked about malinol and she said that it is routinely used to stimulate appetite. She off ered to use it for Barbara instead of the appetite stimulator that she was already using. So all my worrying about getting someone to prescribe malinol for us was unnecessary.

Barbara was still quite tired on the following day but, on the day after that, she was more alert. She did well in physical therapy and her p.t. therapist, her speech therapist and Diana Childress each commented that her speech was improved. This is good news. But what now?

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Wednesday news

Barbara looked good and was quite alert today and talking a little better.

Mimi

Mid-October to beginning of November

Yesterday, Mimi and I met with the team at the NYU rehab center on 17th St. The situation, as I already knew from my reading, is grim and we can expect things to get only worse. The choice offered was to continue treatment or just stop. In the best case, with treatment, we have one year, though exceptions arise. I elected to try another round of treatment to see if Barbara could feel better for a while. We also had to choose between bringing her home and getting her into a sub-acute rehab center. That is a tough call since she needs help with all her activities and would be at risk of injury at home, especially as things get worse, even with hired help. I am leaning toward a rehab center but it is a painful choice. Predrag has come and is helping me get ready at home if it goes that way. He and Steve Childress have installed the motion detector in the small room. It beeps in the bedroom but the frequency is high and it is not loud enough to wake me up if I am asleep. This triviality is really a decisive factor since Barbara does not wait for help. And she cannot walk unaided.

Oct. 24: Sub-acute on Hudson St.

Barbara was moved from Rusk on 17th St. on (or about) Oct. 24. to the sub-acute rehab center (VillageCare) on Hudson and 12th Sts.

The center assigned (what they call) one-on-one persons to watch her around the clock. They normally do not provide such care and it was kept up for only two days and two nights. But Barbara was still not aware enough to be cautious. She tried to get out of bed whenever she felt like it. However, she could not stand or walk without support and such actions put her in danger of falling. I had to act quickly and hired a woman and her two daughters to maintain a 24-hour watch on Barbara. They charge $15/hr for this service.

This team was found by Mimi who found it through a friend of Barbara. They have done such work for several patients, until the patients died. They prefer to work in the patient's home where their care includes light cooking and cleaning, travel to medical appointments, and administration of medicines. The mother has various licenses for these tasks. Such one-on-one treatment for a year would run into some serious expense, but I feel it would be worth it if it gives some comfort to Barbara. I cannot tell whether she likes what is going on but I do not detect any enthusiasm. I am not entirely happy with the three ladies --- they seem a bit insensitive. Since Barbara cannot speak, this is an awkward situation. I have to decide what to do when B is discharged from this rehab center, which is considered short term. Once we go home, it becomes awkward to change the arrangements.

Nov. 2: Evaluative meeting

On Nov. 2, the staff had its evaluative meeting. They had to decide whether the goals for Barbara had been met after her nine days in the center. They felt that this may have happened since she has been able to walk a bit (with some support) as a result of the physical therapy they provide. By raising their expectations of the goals, they were able to agree to another two or three weeks here in VillageCare. So I now must seek a long term solution for looking after Barbara.

In the afternoon, following my meeting with the staff in the morning, we had to go uptown to for the first MRI since the five weeks of radiation and chemotherapy. Then the oncologist will no doubt pronounce on the situation. That will be reported in the next installment.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Hospice next


[posted by Predrag, notes from phone conversations with Ed and Mimi, sorry if garbled]

Dr. Omuro decided that further treatment is unwarranted, and that Barbara should be moved to hospice care. Ed is angry, but also understands and accepts that hospice is the next step.

Barbara smiles, can walk a few steps and even crack a joke. The critical step now is to make sure that she gets into the new VillageCare facility. Mimi says that the private rooms are very nice and spacious.

For comic relief: There is now considerable literature on the Kolmogorov-Spiegel-Sivashinsky equation. Ed protested that he does not know the Kolmogorov-Spiegel equation, but was told that Kolmogorov does not have anything to do with it either. But KS equation could be mistaken for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky? That's how it got renamed the KSS [Kolmogorov-Spiegel-Sivashinsky] equation. Ed has no clue what it is.

Visit to NY

Hi everybody, I just spent three days in New York, mostly with Barbara and Ed. It is very sad to see Barbara having so much difficulty express herself, but it was also great to see her. Lots of visitors dropped by: Joe and Alice, Mimi, Judy, Susie, Charles.... Ed and I had a couple of meals together when Barbara slept. Ed is in touch with an adviser from a health care provider about what to do next, regarding care if B has to go home, etc. I talked to her and she seems very helpful. I also got to travel back to Madison with a metal African statue to give to Donna Page, a woman who mounts Ed's art for him. Previously it was all wrapped and ready to be shipped by post, according to Ed, but Predrag unwrapped it thinking it was an incoming parcel, I suppose. These are the dangers of meddling with the Krusty Old One's home office! Best, Jean-Luc

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Settled into the new routine


[posted by Predrag, notes from emails and phone conversations with Ed, Antonello and Mimi, sorry if garbled]

Barbara is settling into the new routine at the Village Nursing Home. She has a nice private room and is undergoing rehabilitation therapy (speech, occupational, physical). Her condition is not improving - the first day she has not been speaking, and it is uncertain whether she always recognizes people around her. This could be due to the stress of moving.

Ed has hired three caregivers (a mother and her two daughters) who provide 24/7 care by her side, and will also do that if Barbara is moved back to the apartment. This takes enormous load off Ed and Mimi's shoulders, as up until now they tried to be with Barbara through her waking hours, and that has pretty much prevented Ed from taking part in any other life's chores and pleasures.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Barbara has been moved to a close-by sub-acute rehabilitation facility
Short-Stay Rehabilitation Program
Village Nursing Home
607 Hudson St
New York, NY 10014  [map]
Her condition is not improving. Meeting with oncologist is scheduled for Oct 24, Sloan-Kettering MRI Nov 2 and meeting with the radiologist Nov 3.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

That is certainly deserving of [consideration]

Wed Oct 20 morning with Barbara is more frustrating than the Tuesday afternoon. She sits in a wheel chair, elegantly dressed, legs crossed in a manner of a relaxed lady, with Barbara hair, face and expressions, just as you know her. But while Tue afternoon conversation was great, this is much more frustrating. Tuesday I talked about matters that she cares about (apartment, Engelbert, Ed) and she let me know by her expressions that she understood everything I said.

Today the format is different - I am quizzing her on how she feels. No answer comes as a complete sentence; three introductory words [a subject, a verb, an article, ...] followed by a word like 'raise' or 'breaks,' far away from the one she wants to puts together, or no recognizable word at all. She can read large text, but she cannot (or will not?) write text herself. I tried writing down my guesses of words she intended to say, and having her nod yes or no, but that is probably foolish, as she understands what we say. She said 'The soups here are excellent' but when I showed her the sentence written down she disagreed vigorously, so I had to edit it to 'The soups here are NOT excellent.' I completed only one sentence correctly: 'That is certainly deserving of [...]' and when I wrote [consideration] she accepted it. While cute and very Barbara-like that she would formulate an answer to a yes/no question this way, it did not get us any closer to the truth of the situation. Maybe a trained neurologist could figure it out, but I failed over and over.

This is what I understood (or perhaps misunderstood): She has no headaches. She can swallow. Her mouth is dry, but not too bad. She does not dream. She feels the same on Wednesday as she did on Sunday, neither worse nor better (to us it looks like she is doing better today than three days ago). She understands everything. When Ed reads to her a message that Pete Wilson from Vanguard called, she makes an annoyed face - she knows it is the insurance man, calling about the Falmouth house.

Why does she not drink water? This one really worries Ed - in 3-4 hours I have seen her drink maybe six drops of fluid through a straw. Did not get an answer on that. The real questions, the elephant in the room questions I did not ask: does she understand her ailment? does she want to take active part in treatment decisions? does she want to go home? Only Ed and Mimi can ask...

Predrag

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

A happy day with Barbara

For once, a happy day - had a very good afternoon with Barbara, and even though she cannot put together sentences with difficult words, she understood everything I had to tell her. That was long and complicated - I gave her a report on what I have done in the apartment, explained the preparations in the case she returns home, and the whole story of Engelbert, which she knew nothing about.

Combination of a wife who can barely utter three quiet words in a sequence and a husband who is a bit hard of hearing can have its comical moments. Oy, Talkin' bout my generation - everybody's making fun of our generation (for you over 30 who are techno-logically retarded: if text changes color it probably means that if you click on it, something will happen). Concerning simple, doable matters:
  1. She does not want an Ipad to type her words on - says that would be too tiring. I suggest one tries a children's erasable white board where one writes guesses of a word she want to say (she knows what she wants to say, just cannot get the words out) to help her complete sentences? She who used to speak so well...
  2. I told her about her Oratorio Society friends, and she said yes, they can come and see her. Mimi will schedule them, no more than one at any given time.
The current situation is this; they have pulled the day sitter. The night sitter is there from 8pm to 8am. Ed arrives between 10 and 12am and is there typically to 7pm. The social worker said that they have contacted a few sub acute facilities and will be discharging Barbara as soon as the facility has been selected by Ed and Mimi.

Predrag

Continue radiation treatment?

Ed an Mimi have met with a social worker and a neurologist who explained to them a range of options open at this time:

1) Get more radiation and chemotherapy. The doctors at Memorial Sloan Kettering (who administered the chemo and radiation) believe that with more rounds of radiation and chemo Barbara’s life can be extended. If the treatment continues, she will reside in a nursing care facility while being treated as an outpatient with radiation. There is an appointment with Dr. Omuro (Barbara’s doctor at Sloan Kettering) on Nov. 3. At this time an MRI will be done. Ed feels that if the MRi reveals that the tumor has stopped growing, that that will be the most compelling evidence for resuming radiation and chemotherapy.

2) If the decision is made to forego radiation and chemo, hospice care is indicated. Options are moving her to an assisted care living unit close to their apartment, or moving her back home (with 24/7 live-in care). The doctor and social worker did not address the issue about the quality of Barbara’s remaining life in either case, and probably they cannot address it.

I have seen her Sunday evening. She looks beautiful as Barbara does, and her eyes and her smile are as expressive as ever. She recognized us all (by accident there were five of us plus nurses, which is way too many) and talking to me she started two different sentences, but did not get past three words of each, so I have no idea what she wanted to say. Frustrating as hell for her. She ate 1/2 cookie and drank about 6 drops of water during an hour or so I was her - she is kept hydrated by IV.

The night shift sitter was a lovely Jamaican woman who calls her Babs, as Barbaras are called in Jamaica.

Other bits I have been told: There are period of confusion and one is not sure whether she really recognizes her friends and comprehends what is being said. The aides, and sometimes even friends talk in front of her about "her" instead of addressing Barbara directly. The therapists sometimes arrive with no prior information about her condition and medical history - one of them assumed she was recovering from a stroke. They attempt to get Barbara to say her name, dates, etc.; these exercises are frustrating and making her more miserable.

Predrag [together with some input from Ed and Mimi]

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Decisions ahead

I have not seen Barbara myself (had a cold recently, and Ed is doing what he can about keeping germs away from here), but reports from Judy and him are disheartening. She eats little and drinks even less, so she is getting saline solution intravenously. Yesterday, for the first time, she had difficulty recognizing people. Ed usually reads to her, but he is not sure whether he is getting across to her.

Barbara is scheduled to leave the (acute) rehabilitation hospital Oct 27. Options are either returning home (in which case a nurse and a 24/7 night sitters should be found and hired soon), or moving to (as yet unknown) non-acute rehabilitation section elsewhere, typically a wing of a nursing school, or to a rented assisted leaving facility nearby. If you have experience with /advice about any of the above options.

During the day Ed is mostly in the hospital, and I am working in Barbara & Ed's apartment. Barbara has therapy large part of the day. She is shown some signs of improvement - can walk with a walker 30 feet.

There was a long list of things various people could have done, but by now I have done them all. But do not louse courage - by the next week there will be a list of comparable length.

Predrag 404 487 8469

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Barbara is in the rehabilitation hospital

Holly writes:
Barbara was moved on Monday Oct 11 to the
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 17th Street, @ 2nd Avenue,
starting Tue Oct 18 2010: room #930, room telephone 212 598 2782
a rehabilitation hospital on the northeast corner of 17th Street and 2nd Ave (the entrance is on 17th street).

She is dazed, but Ed & Mimi are hopeful that the intense therapy program there will give her some bodily strength & greater facility with speech. Her speech has improved slightly but steadily every day since the shunt was inserted surgically on Thursday. She is having a 5 week break from radiation & chemotherapy, and doctors will assess whether or not it makes sense to do another round of both. She seems happy to see old friends, but tires easily.

Mimi writes:
So far Ed is in the hospital all day long: in these first days he wants to pick up every comment that all the staff make as they drift in and out. Barbara’s schedule is approximately:
  • 9:00 am occupational therapy 
  • 10:00 am speech therapy 
  • 12:00 am lunch 
  • 1:00 pm doctor 
  • 2:00 pm physical therapy
My sense is that providing Barbara with companionship, aid, comfort, or just watching out for her interests and advocating with the staff should start in the mid afternoon and go into the evening. Please contact me if you would like to visit.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Holly writes:

Yesterday, when we were with Barbara, two strapping physical therapist nurses came and got her, much against her will, to stand up and walk down the hall with a walker. She walked slowly and not too surely about 30 yards. I told her she had done well, and she threw me an amused glance and said "You lie!" The old Barbara! We saw Barbara today and there was a significant improvement over yesterday. Barbara was vertical and doing exercises when we arrived this morning. She was talking more lucidly than yesterday. She was eating better also. Her sense of humor is undiminished. We had a lovely time with her.

The doctors think the shunt was successful in helping her ability to talk.

Ed spends as much time with her as he can. We have not been successful in luring him out for a meal. He says he doesn't feel like having even a little bit of fun with Barbara so helpless. But he is affectionate and open with friends and medical caregivers as well. Barbara lights up when he enters, and to see them together is a pleasure to behold. Mimi is unflaggingly generous with her time and care, and Ed & Mimi work together to schedule caregivers taking shifts.

It is sad to see her thinking and struggling to find words and knowing that she cannot. She clearly feels frustrated and knows that the future looks bleak. But she is responsive and happy to see friends. She tires easily. She will have an MRI soon to assess whether or not the chemotherapy and radiation did any good. If they have, she will have another round of both, perhaps, starting in a few weeks.

The Sloan Kettering is a noisy place. Barbara shares a room, and the roommates come & go, as do a flow of nurses, doctors, therapists, etc.: some are attentive & caring, others are brusque & officious. Some are sloppy. It's a bit of a circus there.

Still no word yet on getting her into a rehab hospital. Ed & her case worker are working on this; Rusk at NYU is first choice.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

The shunt inserted

[If you have read the previous installment of these reports (click here), you know that Barbara's inability to walk or talk made it desirable for her to return to the relatively safe environment of the hospital on Sept. 29. Shortly after she returned to MSKCC, she had a spinal tap. This allowed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to leak out, the intention being to allow a reduction of her cranial pressure and so improve her ability to walk. The tap (or lumbar puncture) was carried out but there was little or no improvement in her walking. I suspect that the atrophy that is quite apparent in her leg muscles may also be implicated in this problem.]

In the hope that further reduction of Barbara's cranial pressure might improve her condition, Dr. Omuro proposed that Dr. Gutin should install a shunt in the fluid between the skull and the brain. This would be a conduit of the CSF to the stomach where it would be disposed of. The operation was scheduled for Oct. 5, but Dr. Gutin decided it should wait until the treatment was completed. However, it was then realized that Dr. Yamata had decided that the radiation should be halted after five weeks, not the six weeks we had thought was in store. The operation was then scheduled for Oct. 7. Originally I was told that it would take place at around 2:30 p.m. But, late on the afternoon of Oct. 6, a surgical nurse dropped in on me in Barbara's room to tell me that the operation would take place at 7:00a.m. He told me that Barbara would first be taken to the pre-surgical ward at 6:00 and that I was permitted to accompany her there. So I notified sister Mimi and left for home a bit earlier than usual to get to bed.

The next morning found me at B's bedside at 5:30 and, sure enough, her bed was wheeled out at 6:02 by the wall clock and we went down to pre-op, as we old hands call the place. A nice fellow took my cell phone number and said that, when the operation was over, he would call me to come and get a report from Dr. G. I mentioned that my cell phone had not been ringing on the previous day and had not been taking voice mail messages. He told me not to worry since he could page me if I remained in the lobby. I suggested he then page me as Edoardo since I would probably hear the final O even though I might miss the rest of the announcement. Then sister Mimi showed up and gave him her cell phone number so we seemed on firm ground.

At 7:26, Barbara was wheeled off to the OR and Mimi and I went down to the lobby where we were close to the information desk and the gift shop. The latter offered cappuccini and I had one with a raisin scone and we settled down for the nail-biting session that we had been told would last about an hour. Around 9:30, Mimi made inquiry at the information desk but nothing was known as yet. An hour later, when she tried again, she obtained a number to call. On calling, she learned that I had been sent a voice mail (which my phone did not record) and that attempts to call her failed. (The wrong number had been recorded for her.) At around 11:00 we went upstairs to where we were to see Dr. G. and Barbara. I did finally see Dr. G. (while Mimi was off having breakfast) and he reported that the operation had gone well and offered the hope that it would do some good. Then I settled down to wait for Barbara to come to. This took quite a while.

Around 12:30 we were taken to see Barbara who was finally awake. She had a very beatific look despite the oxygen source for her breathing and the bandage on her forehead and her vital signs were good. We greeted her briefly and, after a couple of minutes, left to make way for the doctors who would check her out. By 1:30, we were waiting in her room for her return.

The next issue is whether the operation has done any good. We may not know that for a couple of days, so I'll stop here till next time.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Operation tomorrow morning!

AFTERNOON UPDATE:

E reports that B is awake after the surgery but it is too early to tell if the operation has had any effect.

LATE NIGHT UPDATE

The radiation and chemotherapy is over for now. The operation that was planned for next week will be tomorrow Thursday at 7am. This is all I know for now.

September

When we reached September, Barbara was quite weak and walked with difficulty. Her right foot began to drag (the tumor is on the left side of her brain). She really could not be left on her own. Getting food was a problem since I could not reliably anticipate the next chance to go shopping. (Here I gratefully acknowledge the help of people who have brought us food, both home made and takeout --- sister Mimi, Judy Vale, the Childresses, the Tressers and, all the way from Ann Arbor, the Doerings. Antonello Provenzale made a flying visit to us from Cape Cod and found time to drop off two cases of seltzer, a favorite family beverage.)

Since I could not predict when I would next get a chance to go shopping, I needed to conserve food as much as possible. I thought back to when I was a young child when I was what was called a poor eater (sic!). There was always food left after I ate. My mother ate those leftovers and I naively believed that she just did not like wasting food, especially after the difficult life she had had as a child. Only later, did I realize that this was a measure of economy. It is a painful recollection for me, but the experience served me well. Barbara is now a poor eater as she is ravaged by chemicals that attack fast growing cells (including some normal ones) and by radiation that makes one quite ill. She is eating very little and I frequently ate what she did not, following my mother's method. But in this case, the reason was not a shortage of funds but of shopping opportunities. However, once we started the treatments, our situation changed. Barbara's siblings hired a chef (Hiranth) who prepares meals for people and he delivers meals to us. That kept us going for four weeks from the start of the radiation treatment on August 30th.

Until September 22nd, we made our way every morning to MSKCC [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center] every morning for Barbara to be irradiated by energetic X-rays. It was slow going, getting Barbara through breakfast and getting dressed, but we did well at getting cabs and were always on time for the radiation treatment.

In conjunction with the radiation, I gave Barbara the pills that constituted her chemotherapy seven nights per week. These consisted of three capsules of Temozolomide (a.k.a. TMZ or Temodar) for a total of 125 mg. Those pills are taken daily on an empty stomach. The optimal time for this is bedtime so that sleep can minimize the awareness of the illness they cause. They are also to be preceded by an antiemetic (anti-nausea) pill by about an hour. This meant having dinner about two hours before before bedtime. So we were eating earlier than had been our habit before the illness. Even so, Barbara was usually sound asleep at pill time.

The TMZ is to be washed down by a full glass of water. I suppose the idea is that it should be dissolved in a fluid to be better absorbed by the stomach wall, but this is only a guess. Still, I tried to follow this rule laid down by the Medco pharmacists. The problem is that Barbara was always extremely reluctant to drink the water or juice, which I also tried. Getting her to drink that fluid was extremely challenging but I shall not enumerate the various devices I tried to get her to drink.

There were also other pills to be taken at other times and in various amounts. Fortunately, a visiting nurse provided us with a pill dispenser whose sub-boxes were arrayed in two dimensions, which made the task easier. Still, it is very hard to keep track of the pills even with this device since the instructions for taking pills come on partly printed, partly scribbled instruction sheets provided by the hospital. They obviously have some good software people and I do not see why they do not provide a more readable instruction sheet with clearer instructions clearly laid out. There should a also be a glossary of the different names each medication is known by since the instructions have a mix of technical names, brand names and popular names. It would also be useful to make a sheet with pictures of the pills including the possible shapes and colors they come in as one finds in the PDR, for example. It is a nightmare to keep track of such things especially given that there were some days when Barbara had to ingest as many as fifteen pills.

When we got home after Barbara's biopsy operation in August, I had not realized how complicated the pill program is. And we did not then know of the good pill dispenser. So when Barbara elected to deal with the pills herself, I naively agreed. Now that I have seen how difficult it is to deal with the pill dispensing, I am haunted by the possibility that she may have missed a dose of the anti-seizure medication back then.

I was also unaware of some of the side effects of some of the pills. Earlier, I wrote of Barbara's frequent visits to the bathroom during the night. After a while, I learned that the steroid she was on was keeping her awake and this was contributing to the problem. Those who know better, would not give this medication in the late evening as I was doing. Once I stopped that, our lives improved and we managed to get a few hours of sound sleep.

And so on through a number of such hurdles.



When the treatments started, Mimi invited Barbara to come to her apartment after the radiation treatment to have some physical therapy with her personal trainer. That was a great boon since Mimi's apartment is reasonably accessible from MSKCC. Nevertheless, Barbara's ability to walk kept declining.

On Sunday, Sept. 19, Mimi had just come by to bring something to Barbara when the downstairs bell rang. It was Joe Keller just back from France. His surprise arrival enlivened Barbara and she agreed to walk the three blocks to Washington Square Park. Mimi did not come all the way to the park but the three of us had a pleasant time sitting on a bench and listening to Joe's tales of the Loire. However, the walk back was extremely difficult. Barbara could hardly stand and her knee was very painful. We had to stop very frequently for her to rest by leaning on a car fender. At one point, we borrowed a chair from a restaurant for her to rest on. We made it home, but just barely.

On the following Tuesday (Sept. 21st), we left 67th St. after the radiation treatment for an MRI on 55th St. and then went on to an appointment with Dr. Omuro on 53rd St. (MSKCC has several campuses.) When he saw Barbara's condition, Dr. O. suggested that she should be kept in the hospital as an inpatient for the remainder of her radiation treatment. I felt this made good sense as Barbara did not make allowances for her infirmity. She would try getting out of bed and walking around and other dangerous maneuvers. Getting her to her radiation treatment was becoming very precarious. She had suffered through three weeks of the treatments and had two more to go. Perhaps all these symptoms would wear off by then. Barbara strongly rejected the suggestion that she be admitted to the hospital and after a long discussion I finally gave in. However the Urgent Care Center (the UCC) had already been alerted to receive her and it took a few hours to extricate ourselves.

The next morning, when we headed off for the radiation treatment, Barbara agreed to use a walker for the first time. As I hailed a cab, Barbara lost control and fell, hitting her knee and body and receiving a slight bump on the head (the right side, mirabile dictu). I reported this when we got to the radiology department since I was not sure that this would preclude radiation. Since Dr. Yamada was in Spain, we had to wait for the release by his cover, Dr. Chan. This finally came in the early afternoon together with Dr. Yamada's nurse's insistence that Barbara remain in the hospital. So after another few hours in the UCC, Barbara returned to her old haunt, the neuro-surveillance ward. I stayed on with her till visiting hours ended and left after reviewing her medications with the night nurse.

As I exited on to the street, the nurse caught up with me and reported that he did not have the TMZ for her chemotherapy. Though I had listed Barbara's medications with the nurse in the UCC at noon, the order for them had not been placed till evening. By then, it was too late to obtain something as special as TMZ since it was locked up. So I went home to the Village, got the medication, and brought it to the nurse at SKMCC.

A further and more worrying complication had also arisen on the previous day when we learned from Dr. Omuro that the MRI taken on 21 Sept. revealed that the cavities (or ventricles) in the brain were filled with fluid.
[From Sara Solla: The ventricles are spaces inside the brain, filled with a fluid called cerebrospinal fluid or CSF. The ventricles connect with the space in the center of the spinal cord and with the membranes covering the brain (the meninges); the fluid can thus circulate around and through the brain and around the spinal cord. The CS fluid is mainly water with a little protein, sugar (glucose), some white blood cells and some hormones. A growing brain tumor can block the circulation of the fluid. The resulting increased pressure within the skull can cause symptoms. With some types of brain tumor, cancer cells can spread in the CSF, causing symptoms similar to meningitis - headaches and problems with sight and movement.]
Once Barbara was in the hospital, Dr. Omuro proposed a spinal tap (or lumbar puncture) to remove excess fluid and thus alleviate some of the unpleasant symptoms Barbara was experiencing. The spinal tap took place a few days after Barbara's admission to the hospital. Now, on 3 Oct., there has not been a significant improvement in B's condition. If anything, it seems worse to me. She cannot walk, nor even stand on her own. Her speech has its ups and downs. She cannot finish a sentence, though she manages an occasional short phrase. She sleeps most of the time and eats very little. How much of all this is because of the tumor or a result of the treatment is hard to say. It certainly calls forth the old remark that the cure is worse than the disease, if it is a cure.

As I write this on Oct. 4, it has been decided to extend Barbara's treatment into a sixth week. After that, the plan is to put in a shunt that will drain the fluid into the body. The insertion is a standard procedure that will take an hour and is predicted to help with the walking. But Barbara's legs are very weak, in any case, compared to what they had been. The date for putting in the shunt has varied and we have been in some agitation over this uncertainty. In fact, I am not sanguine about all this but something has to be done about her condition and that is the only accepted procedure that has been proposed by the doctors. So, after her sixth week of radiation treatment Dr. Gutin will put in the shunt. That will be after Oct. 12 since there was no treatment on Labor day. A hiatus of three or four weeks is planned. In that period, there will be an attempt to put her in a rehabilitation center to help strengthen her for walking and other functions. So I pause abruptly here and will report in a while on the next developments.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Update

Asa and I visited B at the hospital this Saturday. B spoke but was tired. She recognized people.

I am looking into some problem with B's telephone line. Best not to record voice mails, as Ed does not know how to listen to them, and now even cannot listen to them. Verizon cannot decide whether there is a problem with the line or whether there is a billing problem. Will take 2 weeks to send someone to fix. With the marvelous help of Alan Wolf, the TV, DVD and Netflix are up and running. E brings movies to the hospital for B to watch.

My impression is that Ed is in better shape these weeks (he was even in his office last week, after 5 months). He has his laptop in the hospital and is good with emails. Almost never home, ergo home phone calls are dicey, and the cell phone might be on or off.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Treatment schedule update


[posted by Predrag, notes from emails and phone conversations with Ed and Mimi, sorry if garbled]

Tuesday October 12
  • The shunt insertion drain the excess brain fluid scheduled. If all goes well with the shunt insertion she will be transferred to an acute rehab facility in Manhattan. The date for her discharge to the rehab facility is not yet known. Ed and Mimi have prioritized 1) Rusk at NYU, and 2) Columbia Presbyterian. They did not have much information on which to base the choices, so if anyone has information about the quality of different Manhattan acute rehab facilities please advise Mimi Cohen (646-649-2162 home, 646-673-2656 cell)
Monday October 11
  • Radiation cycle 1 completed, no further radiation planned.
Monday October 4
  • Barbara cannot walk at all, she cannot talk, and nurses do not ask what she needs. She understands, but quickly stops listening. She eats little, and it is difficult to persuade to eat. Today she ate a very light breakfast, skipped lunch because of a procedure, and had refused to eat supper. She used to exercise 3 days a week, but now she does no exercise, and her leg and arm muscles are very thin. Ed's impression is that the spinal tap did not accomplish anything. The SK setup is to treat only the tumor, but not the whole person. Nurses are not keeping close eye on her, so if you would like to sit 3-4 hours by her side, let Mimi Cohen (646-649-2162 home, 646-673-2656 cell) know what days and times might work for you, and she'll try to work out a schedule to help out Barbara and Ed.
Sunday October 3
  • Chemo cycle 1 completed, 1 month pause.
Monday September 26
  • Barbara had radiation, chemo, 32/mg dexa (!), an EKG, a chest X-ray and a spinal tap today. Spinal tap, or a therapeutic lumbar puncture is a treatment to relieve increased intracranial pressure. It takes about 3 days for lumbar puncture site to heal. Doctors are planing to follow this up with a shunt which drains the excess fluid from the brain by diverting it to another place in the body.

    Sister Mimi says that Barbara had no complaints so far after the tap, and was a brighter this evening, probably due to the positive effect of the spinal tap.


    [Sara background notes, not Ed's text: Cancer Compass web page has a section on brain cancer, where both patients and caretakers post about their experiences. There are many reports about the effects of steroids. They are a crucial tool to control swelling, but they have very bad side effects. Caretakers report mood swings, personality changes, irritability, stubbornness. These symptoms seem to be clearly related to the steroids, as they decrease significantly when the dosage is gradually decreased. However, decreasing the steroids might not be an option for Barbara. She was on 6mg/day dexa (decadron) after the seizure, slowly tapered down to 3mg/day. As her speech was not improving, and her walking deteriorated seriously, Dr. Yamada concluded that the tumor was cutting off the blood supply and first raised the dosage up to 8mg/day, and then to 16/mg day. That is a very high dose. B now talks a bit better.


    The ventricles are spaces inside the brain, filled with cerebrospinal fluid or CSF. The ventricles connect with the space in the center of the spinal cord and with the membranes covering the brain (the meninges); the fluid can thus circulate around and through the brain and around the spinal cord. The CS fluid is mainly water with a little protein, sugar (glucose), some white blood cells and some hormones. A growing brain tumor can block the circulation of the fluid. The resulting increased pressure within the skull can cause symptoms. With some types of brain tumor, cancer cells can spread in the CSF, causing symptoms similar to meningitis - headaches and problems with sight and movement. The spinal tap is a safe procedure, with very low probability of something going wrong. It is preferable to going into the brain itself with a needle.]
Saturday September 25
  • I am in B's room in the hospital. She is very tired, visitors tire her out. B cannot walk to the bathroom alone, needs assistance. Last week she was smiling, but ever since they doubled the steriods she looks unhappy. Doctors are considering a spinal tap on Monday.
Thursday September 23
  • I am by B's side in Sloan-Kettering since I don't like leaving her alone here. Some people have dropped in for brief visits today and she seemed to enjoy that.
Wednesday September 22
  • B fell this morning and she had a CAT scan and a neurological exam. The MRI showed fluid in the ventricles and Dr. Omuro is considering an operation with needle, or a spinal tap.

[Ed prefers not to have to deal with comments, but please feel free to comment to posts by Predrag]

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Haircut

Today Mimi and Suzie are in the hospital with Barbara, Ed will be with her in the evening.
Shane reports: "Ed sounded in good form on the phone. He is going to the office today for the first time in 4-5 months. He's also thinking about getting a haircut at his barber uptown."
Predrag:  One of Ed's persistent life mysteries why Barbara allows him to go to only one barber in all of the New York City, but when they are in Italy, she is pleased with the work of no matter which barber. He has been told that is because Italian men are so vain that the worst barber in Italy is as good as the best one in New York.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

On vaccine made from patients' tumors

[posted by Predrag, notes on a treatment that Ed expressed interest in. Probably Barbara cannot join the trial, as it requires craniotomy, but otherwise the timing is right, and she is eligible. Would be good to contact Dr. Jeffrey Bruce, a surgeon at Columbia University Medical Center]


Research premise: Vaccines made from a person's tumor cells may help the body build an effective immune response to kill tumor cells.

Dr. Andrew Parsa
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, CA
Contact: Valerie A Kivett, BS 415-353-2076 kivettv@neurosurg.ucsf.edu
heads the trial. He writes:
Immunotherapy is an attractive alternative to conventional adjuvant therapy because it can specifically target malignant glial cells while preserving function of surrounding cells, including neurons. Several clinical trials of active immunotherapy for malignant glioma patients have been initiated. [...] My laboratory has focused on the phenomenon of immunoresistance in cancer, and how immunoresistance relates to fundamental oncogenic events. [...] I have collaborated with a biotechnology company, Antigenics Incorporated, to develop an investigator initiated clinical trial to treat recurrent glioma patients with an autologous tumor derived heat shock protein vaccine. The phase I portion of this trial has finished accrual, and we have generated some favorable initial survival data as well as compelling immunomonitoring data. A multi-center Phase II study is currently underway for recurrent glioblastoma patients as well as a single center Phase II study evaluating the vaccine in primary glioblastoma patients treated with chemotherapy after radiation.
Parsa heads two clinical trials. The Phase 1 trial, running since 2006 and closed to accrual as of 7/25/2007, is the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded "GP96 Heat Shock Protein-Peptide Complex Vaccine in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Glioma"

One of the Co-PIs (Phase 1 only) is Jeffrey Bruce, MD
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (recruiting patients)
Columbia University Medical Center, New York
Contact: Candy Yanes cy2162@columbia.edu
The Phase 2 trial "HSPPC-96 Vaccine With Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed GBM (HeatShock)" started June 2009, runs through 2011, is conducted ONLY in San Francisco.

Phase 2 trial eligibility:
  • Able to read and understand the informed consent document; must sign the informed consent
  • Histologically proven, non-progressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
  • Must have suspected diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme with a surgical intent to resect at least 90% of enhancing disease
  • Surgically accessible tumor for which surgical resection is indicated and has not been previously irradiated
  • Prior radiotherapy required
Intervention:
  • Conventional surgery craniotomy
  • Patients undergo surgical resection. Viable tumor tissue is used to generate the gp96 heat shock protein-peptide complex (HSPPC-96) vaccine. Patients with primary disease receive standard adjuvant therapy after surgery. Patients whose disease progresses during or after standard adjuvant therapy receive the HSPPC-96 vaccine. Patients with recurrent disease receive the HSPPC-96 vaccine between 2-8 weeks after surgery. The HSPPC-96 vaccine is administered intradermally every 1-3 weeks for 4 doses and then every 2-3 weeks thereafter in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or vaccine depletion.
  • Patients are treated with the autologous tumor-derived heat shock protein peptide-complex (HSPPC-96) administered at 25 μg per dose injected intradermally once weekly for 4 consecutive weeks and monthly following standard treatment with radiation and temozolomide.
From a CNN article: "More than a year into the ongoing clinical trial, none of the eight patients who have received vaccines made from their tumors has seen cancer return."

A blog by Mino Freund, NASA Ames Research Center astrophysicist and a patient in Parsa's clinical trial, is worth a read. Stops July 2010.

Sara notes: also investigate treatment with Ativan.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

B in the hospital

Just heard that B fell and is at the hospital. I quote E:

"She fell this morning and she is now having a CAT scan. They want to keep her for safety in any case. I don't know how long she'll be in here."

Ed seem to have his laptop if people want to get in touch.

Joe asks Andreas: do you have any more details about the fall and whether Barbara was seriously injured?

Andreas September 23, 2010 9AM : I think B is back home. More a checkup that everything is OK.

Monday, September 20, 2010

A contact at Columbia?

Andrea Califano, Columbia Professor of Biomedical Informatics, models Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) brain tumors and should know a lot about them. Might be of interest to talk to.

PS from Predrag: I have had a few longer conversations with Ed about Barbara over last two weeks, sorry I have not reported on them yet. The news are not good. The treatment is very exhausting, and no signs of improvement.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Ed's brush with technology

With B in the hands of her sister, I made a dash to PC Richards. This was in accord with Charles' strongly advocated rule that I should see the set before I bought it. They all looked alike to me, except for size. The salesman (called Fidel) said that was because the parameters were adjusted to make them aggressive. At home they would not look like that. So I could not follow the spirit of Charles' prescription.

I then followed Jean-Luc's advice, backed up by Jeff, and asked for the Samsung plasma. The salesman approved. However, I applied Alan's correction and got a 50" screen. Though it did look a bit large, the salesman said it was the good choice. I assume he was working on commission but, still, he did not push me to LCDs.

I got the DVD player suggested by Jeff and bought the whole schmear on the spot including delivery and assembly, thus giving Andreas more time to work on his thesis instead of fooling with gadgetry. I was amazed to get same-day delivery. Charles had said it was best to get the cable installed before the TV came but the salesman assured me that having the TV in first was the right way to go. I believe Charles but I wanted to have the business done with.

Thursday, Sept 16: It is as I expected. These things are never simple.

Two nice Barbadians (one was the salesman) showed up at 9:00 last night and put together the stand (not a trivial task) and set the TV on the table in the living room. It is very large. One of them told me that they always look twice as large as they did on the wall of the show room. It is huge. He said that we would adjust after a week and would love it. Well Alan loves his so, unless he's moved into a huge apartment since I last saw him, I ought to be able to adjust. But Barbara had a shock on entering the living room this morning.

The set on its pedestal is rather unstable but for $200+ I can get a solid stand that will hold the thing up. I guess I have to go for this. The DVD came with the wrong cables so could not be attached. I need those. I need a surge protector. One of the delivery guys will call me about all that at 1:30. So we are not in business as yet. It is pretty big though.

They charged $80 (cash) for the work and I suspect that there is a fiddle in there somewhere but I have not got the strength to argue about all this any more.

So continues my brush with technology.

Friday, Sept 17: I know you are all anxiously awaiting the news of our technical progress here.

With a TV and DVD player installed we can play DCVs. Tonight, we screened (if that is the word I want) "Top Hat" thanks to the combined NetFlix gift of Predrag and Milena Cuellar and Predrag's administrative actions. It is a brilliant display by Astaire and Rogers in their kind of dancing against the backdrop of the standard formulaic romance of that era. Barbara watched half before dinner and could not stay up for the other half after dinner. But she does love that stuff and will see how it comes out tomorrow.

When the set is on, it is a marvel. When it is off, it is the elephant in the room. I must get a decorative painting to put in front of it when it is not being used.

I promise not to send you a report whenever a movie is played.